Wicomico and Washington County Sheriffs Take Maryland Immigration Law to Court
Two Maryland sheriffs are asking a court to block parts of a recently enacted immigration law, setting up a new legal battle between local officials and state leaders.

A legal fight over immigration enforcement is unfolding in Maryland, where two county sheriffs are challenging a newly enacted state law they argue interferes with local law enforcement responsibilities.
The lawsuit, filed by the sheriffs of Wicomico and Washington counties, challenges requirements they argue interfere with their ability to carry out public safety responsibilities and cooperate with federal agencies.
With both sides claiming public safety concerns, the outcome could influence how local governments across the state navigate their role in immigration enforcement moving forward.
Maryland Sheriffs Move to Block New Immigration Restrictions
The sheriffs of Wicomico and Washington counties joined a federal lawsuit challenging Maryland's new Community Trust Act, arguing that the law limits how local agencies can cooperate with federal immigration authorities, including ICE.
The case was filed in U.S. District Court with support from sheriffs across the state. In total, 17 of Maryland's 24 county sheriffs signed onto the lawsuit, making it one of the largest coordinated legal challenges by law enforcement officials in recent state history.
The law is expected to take effect later this year after Gov. Wes Moore allowed it to become law without his signature. Sheriffs argue the measure creates barriers to information-sharing and cooperation with federal immigration enforcement agencies, while supporters say it is designed to strengthen trust between immigrant communities and local law enforcement.
Who Is Backing the Lawsuit — And Why It Matters
The legal challenge is not coming from just one county. Sheriffs from 17 of Maryland's 24 counties have joined the lawsuit, including officials from Wicomico and Washington counties, showing broad resistance from local law enforcement leaders to the state's new immigration law.
Key Points From the Lawsuit
17 county sheriffs have signed onto the federal court challenge.
The lawsuit seeks to block Maryland's Community Trust Act before full implementation.
Sheriffs argue the law limits cooperation with federal immigration authorities, including ICE.
Supporters of the law say it helps strengthen trust between immigrant communities and local police.
Why Sheriffs Are Pushing Back
Law enforcement leaders involved in the case argue that the legislation creates new restrictions on communication and coordination with federal agencies. They claim those limitations could affect public safety operations and make it harder to work across different levels of government when handling certain criminal investigations.
Why Maryland Passed The Law
Supporters of the Community Trust Act argue that limiting local involvement in immigration enforcement helps build trust with immigrant communities.
State leaders have said local police should focus on public safety responsibilities while federal immigration enforcement remains the responsibility of ICE. Gov. Moore's office has maintained that Maryland can support law enforcement while also protecting constitutional rights and community trust.
Why Immigration Groups Are Watching Closely
The lawsuit arrives as immigration enforcement policies continue to face legal challenges nationwide.
Advocacy organizations and immigrant-rights groups are closely monitoring the case because the outcome could influence how much cooperation local law enforcement agencies can have with federal immigration authorities in Maryland moving forward.
YOU MAY LIKE
What Maryland and the Sheriffs Are Saying
As the legal fight moves into federal court, both sides are making it clear that this case is about more than policy differences — it is about who controls immigration-related enforcement at the local level.
What the Sheriffs Are Arguing
In the lawsuit, the sheriffs claim Maryland's Community Trust Act would place local agencies in what they describe as an "impossible and unconstitutional position" by limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities while federal immigration laws remain in effect.
Court filings also argue that the law would "intentionally obstruct federal law enforcement" and interfere with their responsibility to work alongside federal agencies on public safety matters.
What Maryland Leaders Say
Governor Wes Moore allowed the legislation to become law earlier this year. Supporters of the measure argue that limiting local involvement in immigration enforcement helps build trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement agencies.
Moore previously described ICE as an "unaccountable agency" and said the legislation sends "a very clear statement" that community safety remains the state's priority.
What Happens Next — The Legal Fight Is Just Beginning
The lawsuit did not emerge in isolation. It comes after Maryland approved the Community Trust Act, a measure designed to limit how local law enforcement agencies cooperate with federal immigration authorities unless specific legal conditions are met. The law is scheduled to take effect later this year.
The Numbers Behind the Legal Challenge
17 of Maryland's 24 county sheriffs have joined the federal lawsuit.
The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.
Sheriffs are seeking a court order to block the Community Trust Act before implementation.
The lawsuit argues the law interferes with coordination between local agencies and ICE.
Why The Outcome Matters
If the sheriffs succeed, local agencies may retain broader authority to communicate and coordinate with federal immigration officials. If the state prevails, Maryland could become one of the strongest examples of a state placing limits on local involvement in federal immigration enforcement.
For immigrant families, advocacy groups, and local governments, the court's decision could influence how immigration-related policing is handled not only in Maryland, but potentially in other states considering similar laws.
USImmiNews Take — A Case With Implications Beyond Maryland
What began as a dispute over a state law has quickly evolved into a larger debate about the balance of power between state governments, local law enforcement, and federal immigration authorities.
For immigrants, the case does not change current immigration rules. But the court's decision could influence future policies and law enforcement practices in Maryland and beyond.
As the legal battle moves forward, both supporters and critics of the law will be watching closely for a ruling that may have nationwide implications.
The information on this page is for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Immigration laws and policies change frequently. Always consult a licensed immigration attorney or accredited representative before making any immigration decisions.
Last Updated: [02 June 2026] — This article reflects information available as of [02 June 2026]. Policies may have changed. Check USCIS.gov for the most current guidance.



