Logo
Live Updates

Follow Us

search

Wicomico and Washington County Sheriffs Take Maryland Immigration Law to Court

Two Maryland sheriffs are asking a court to block parts of a recently enacted immigration law, setting up a new legal battle between local officials and state leaders.

A
Allen
Senior Analyst
JUN 2, 2026 at 7:45 PM UTC
Wicomico and Washington County Sheriffs Take Maryland Immigration Law to Court
Court documents and county law enforcement officials are at the center of a lawsuit challenging Maryland's immigration enforcement restrictions.
schedule
Last reviewed: Jun 3, 2026Policies may have changed. Visit uscis.gov for the most current guidance.

A legal fight over immigration enforcement is unfolding in Maryland, where two county sheriffs are challenging a newly enacted state law they argue interferes with local law enforcement responsibilities. 

The lawsuit, filed by the sheriffs of Wicomico and Washington counties, challenges requirements they argue interfere with their ability to carry out public safety responsibilities and cooperate with federal agencies. 

With both sides claiming public safety concerns, the outcome could influence how local governments across the state navigate their role in immigration enforcement moving forward.

Maryland Sheriffs Move to Block New Immigration Restrictions

The sheriffs of Wicomico and Washington counties joined a federal lawsuit challenging Maryland's new Community Trust Act, arguing that the law limits how local agencies can cooperate with federal immigration authorities, including ICE.

The case was filed in U.S. District Court with support from sheriffs across the state. In total, 17 of Maryland's 24 county sheriffs signed onto the lawsuit, making it one of the largest coordinated legal challenges by law enforcement officials in recent state history.

The law is expected to take effect later this year after Gov. Wes Moore allowed it to become law without his signature. Sheriffs argue the measure creates barriers to information-sharing and cooperation with federal immigration enforcement agencies, while supporters say it is designed to strengthen trust between immigrant communities and local law enforcement.

Who Is Backing the Lawsuit — And Why It Matters

The legal challenge is not coming from just one county. Sheriffs from 17 of Maryland's 24 counties have joined the lawsuit, including officials from Wicomico and Washington counties, showing broad resistance from local law enforcement leaders to the state's new immigration law.

Key Points From the Lawsuit

  • 17 county sheriffs have signed onto the federal court challenge.

  • The lawsuit seeks to block Maryland's Community Trust Act before full implementation.

  • Sheriffs argue the law limits cooperation with federal immigration authorities, including ICE.

  • Supporters of the law say it helps strengthen trust between immigrant communities and local police.

Why Sheriffs Are Pushing Back

Law enforcement leaders involved in the case argue that the legislation creates new restrictions on communication and coordination with federal agencies. They claim those limitations could affect public safety operations and make it harder to work across different levels of government when handling certain criminal investigations.

Why Maryland Passed The Law

Supporters of the Community Trust Act argue that limiting local involvement in immigration enforcement helps build trust with immigrant communities.

State leaders have said local police should focus on public safety responsibilities while federal immigration enforcement remains the responsibility of ICE. Gov. Moore's office has maintained that Maryland can support law enforcement while also protecting constitutional rights and community trust.

Why Immigration Groups Are Watching Closely

The lawsuit arrives as immigration enforcement policies continue to face legal challenges nationwide.

Advocacy organizations and immigrant-rights groups are closely monitoring the case because the outcome could influence how much cooperation local law enforcement agencies can have with federal immigration authorities in Maryland moving forward.

What Maryland and the Sheriffs Are Saying 

As the legal fight moves into federal court, both sides are making it clear that this case is about more than policy differences — it is about who controls immigration-related enforcement at the local level.

What the Sheriffs Are Arguing

In the lawsuit, the sheriffs claim Maryland's Community Trust Act would place local agencies in what they describe as an "impossible and unconstitutional position" by limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities while federal immigration laws remain in effect.

Court filings also argue that the law would "intentionally obstruct federal law enforcement" and interfere with their responsibility to work alongside federal agencies on public safety matters.

What Maryland Leaders Say

Governor Wes Moore allowed the legislation to become law earlier this year. Supporters of the measure argue that limiting local involvement in immigration enforcement helps build trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement agencies.

Moore previously described ICE as an "unaccountable agency" and said the legislation sends "a very clear statement" that community safety remains the state's priority.

What Happens Next — The Legal Fight Is Just Beginning

The lawsuit did not emerge in isolation. It comes after Maryland approved the Community Trust Act, a measure designed to limit how local law enforcement agencies cooperate with federal immigration authorities unless specific legal conditions are met. The law is scheduled to take effect later this year.

The Numbers Behind the Legal Challenge

  • 17 of Maryland's 24 county sheriffs have joined the federal lawsuit.

  • The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.

  • Sheriffs are seeking a court order to block the Community Trust Act before implementation.

  • The lawsuit argues the law interferes with coordination between local agencies and ICE.

Why The Outcome Matters

If the sheriffs succeed, local agencies may retain broader authority to communicate and coordinate with federal immigration officials. If the state prevails, Maryland could become one of the strongest examples of a state placing limits on local involvement in federal immigration enforcement.

For immigrant families, advocacy groups, and local governments, the court's decision could influence how immigration-related policing is handled not only in Maryland, but potentially in other states considering similar laws.

USImmiNews Take — A Case With Implications Beyond Maryland

What began as a dispute over a state law has quickly evolved into a larger debate about the balance of power between state governments, local law enforcement, and federal immigration authorities.

For immigrants, the case does not change current immigration rules. But the court's decision could influence future policies and law enforcement practices in Maryland and beyond.

As the legal battle moves forward, both supporters and critics of the law will be watching closely for a ruling that may have nationwide implications.

The information on this page is for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Immigration laws and policies change frequently. Always consult a licensed immigration attorney or accredited representative before making any immigration decisions.

Last Updated: [02 June 2026] — This article reflects information available as of [02 June 2026]. Policies may have changed. Check USCIS.gov for the most current guidance.

Next Article

Massachusetts Schools and Churches Receive Fresh Direction on ICE Enforcement

Massachusetts education and faith leaders are reviewing updated guidance outlining how schools and churches should respond to immigration enforcement requests.

C
Camila
Senior Analyst
JUN 2, 2026 at 8:30 PM UTC
Massachusetts Schools and Churches Receive Fresh Direction on ICE Enforcement
A Massachusetts school entrance and church building as community institutions review updated guidance related to ICE enforcement procedures.
schedule
Last reviewed: Jun 3, 2026Policies may have changed. Visit uscis.gov for the most current guidance.

Massachusetts schools and religious institutions are receiving updated guidance on how to respond if federal immigration agents seek access to their properties, as concerns over immigration enforcement continue to grow across the state.

The new direction is intended to help administrators, faith leaders, and staff understand their legal responsibilities while protecting the rights of students, families, congregants, and visitors.

For many immigrant families, the update offers a clearer picture of what to expect—and what protections may still apply.

Massachusetts Issues ICE Guidance for Schools and Churches

Massachusetts officials have issued fresh statewide guidance outlining how schools, child care centers, colleges, hospitals, and places of worship should respond if Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrive on-site. The guidance was announced by Gov.

Key Instructions Included in the Guidance

  • Schools and churches are encouraged to create written ICE-response policies and train staff in advance.

  • A designated administrator or senior staff member should serve as the primary contact if federal agents arrive.

  • Staff should immediately contact legal counsel before allowing access to nonpublic areas.

  • ICE agents can be denied entry unless they present a valid judicial warrant signed by a judge.

  • Administrative warrants issued by immigration authorities alone do not automatically grant access to restricted spaces.

Areas Considered Nonpublic

The guidance identifies several locations that may be treated as private or restricted areas, including:

  • Classrooms and child care rooms

  • Offices and staff-only spaces

  • Dormitories and research areas

  • Medical exam rooms

  • Nursery and worship preparation areas

State officials recommend clearly marking these spaces and posting visitor policies where appropriate.

Additional Measures Announced

  • Massachusetts previously signed an executive order restricting the use of state property for immigration enforcement staging operations.

  • The state also created reporting channels for residents and institutions to document alleged misconduct during enforcement actions.

  • Officials say the new guidance is designed to help vulnerable spaces understand existing legal protections and response procedures.

The guidance does not change federal immigration law, but it gives schools, churches, and community institutions a clearer framework for handling encounters with immigration officers.

Schools, Faith Communities, and Immigrant Families Feel the Impact

The new Massachusetts guidance is aimed at institutions that regularly serve immigrant families, children, patients, and worshippers. State officials say the goal is to reduce confusion and ensure staff know how to respond if immigration agents appear on-site.

Education Settings

Schools, colleges, universities, and child care centers are being advised to:

  • Assign a trained administrator as the main ICE contact.

  • Identify public and nonpublic areas in advance.

  • Avoid sharing student or family information with immigration agents.

  • Keep enforcement activity away from classrooms and children whenever possible.

State leaders also acknowledged that school attendance has dropped in some communities where immigration enforcement activity has increased, raising concerns among educators and parents.

Churches and Places of Worship

Religious institutions are being encouraged to strengthen visitor policies and clearly define private areas within their buildings.

Key recommendations include:

  • Training staff and volunteers on ICE response procedures.

  • Posting signs identifying restricted spaces.

  • Holding "know your rights" sessions for congregants.

  • Limiting access to certain worship or ministry areas when necessary.

Faith leaders involved in the rollout said many churches had been unsure about their legal rights when dealing with federal immigration officers and welcomed clearer guidance.

Immigrant Families

Families with mixed immigration status, asylum seekers, undocumented immigrants, and newly arrived migrants are among those most closely watching the changes.

Massachusetts officials argue that fear of immigration enforcement has discouraged some residents from attending school, seeking health care, reporting crimes, or participating in religious services — concerns that helped drive the state's latest response.

Healey Says Schools, Churches, and Hospitals Must Remain Safe Spaces

Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey said the new guidance is intended to protect residents who have become increasingly fearful of immigration enforcement activity in community spaces.

Speaking during the announcement, Healey said the state wants to make it clear that schools, churches, health centers, and child care facilities should understand their rights when dealing with federal immigration officers.

Key Statements From Healey

People are afraid to go to church. People are afraid to worship.”

“People should be able to go to church, to drop their kids off at school, to go get health care, to go report crimes.”

“ICE is scaring our families away.

What Gov. Maura Healey Said

During a State House press conference, Healey said the guidance was issued after reports of increased immigration enforcement activity in sensitive community spaces.

Key points from the governor's remarks:

  • Institutions should have written ICE-response policies and trained staff ahead of time.

  • ICE cannot enter nonpublic areas without a valid judicial warrant signed by a judge.

  • Schools, churches, hospitals, and child care centers should immediately contact legal counsel if agents arrive.

  • Staff should avoid sharing personal information about students, families, patients, or congregants.

Healey also said the state has received complaints that immigration enforcement activity is discouraging some families from sending children to school, seeking medical care, attending worship services, or reporting crimes. 

What the State Is Emphasizing

According to the Healey administration, the guidance:

  • Does not change federal immigration law.

  • Clarifies the difference between judicial and administrative warrants.

  • Allows institutions to request legal review before granting access to nonpublic areas.

  • Encourages organizations to protect confidential student, patient, and family information.

  • Builds on an executive order signed earlier this year restricting certain immigration enforcement activity on state property.

State officials say the overall goal is to reduce confusion, improve preparedness, and ensure that schools, churches, and health facilities know how to respond if immigration agents arrive at their doors.

Why Massachusetts Is Taking Action Now

The new guidance comes as immigration enforcement policies across the U.S. continue to face legal, political, and community pushback. Massachusetts officials say schools, churches, hospitals, and child care centers needed clearer instructions after federal policies surrounding so-called “sensitive locations” changed earlier this year.

What Changed Nationally?

In January 2025, the Department of Homeland Security rescinded a long-standing policy that had limited immigration enforcement actions in locations such as:

  • Schools and universities

  • Churches and places of worship

  • Hospitals and health facilities

  • Child care centers

  • Community service locations

The policy change raised concerns among educators, faith leaders, immigration advocates, and local governments across several states.

Why Massachusetts Responded

Gov. Maura Healey said the state began reviewing protections after reports of increased immigration enforcement activity and growing fear among immigrant families.

According to state officials:

  • Some families became hesitant to send children to school.

  • Others avoided health care appointments and court appearances.

  • Religious leaders reported concerns about worship attendance and community outreach programs.

Healey also signed an executive order earlier this year preventing ICE from using Massachusetts state property as staging locations for immigration enforcement operations. The administration has since pushed for additional protections involving nonpublic community spaces.

What Happens Next — Key Developments to Watch

Massachusetts is now moving from guidance to implementation. Schools, churches, hospitals, and child care centers are expected to review their policies and train staff on how to respond if ICE agents arrive on-site.

What's Expected Next?

  • Schools and churches may update visitor and access policies.

  • Staff training on ICE-response procedures is likely to increase.

  • Community organizations may hold more "know your rights" workshops.

  • State officials will continue monitoring reports of enforcement activity.

  • Any alleged violations could be reviewed by the Massachusetts Attorney General's office.

Why It Matters

For immigrant families, the focus is not on new immigration laws but on understanding what protections and procedures apply in places they rely on every day. How institutions implement this guidance could shape community trust in the months ahead.

USImmiNews Take — Clarity Matters More Than Ever

Massachusetts is not changing federal immigration law, but it is giving schools and churches a clearer playbook for handling encounters with ICE. For many institutions, that clarity may help reduce confusion during high-pressure situations.

Supporters see the guidance as a way to protect access to education, worship, and community services, while critics argue it could create additional friction between state and federal authorities.

What remains clear is that immigrant families are looking for certainty. Knowing the rules before an enforcement encounter occurs can make a significant difference for schools, faith leaders, and the communities they serve.

The information on this page is for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Immigration laws and policies change frequently. Always consult a licensed immigration attorney or accredited representative before making any immigration decisions.

Last Updated: [02 June 2026] — This article reflects information available as of [02 June 2026]. Policies may have changed. Check USCIS.gov for the most current guidance.

Next Article
Loading Next Story...
Reading:Wicomico and Washington County Sheriffs Take Maryland Immigration Law to Court
Article 1 of 4

g_translateSelect Language

Loading languages...